24/02/2016

Book 201: The Sympathizer

Posted in World fiction at 1:22 pm by Mark MacLean

Sympathizer31 May 2016, venue TBA

Viet Thanh Nguyen.

Book 199: The Year Of The Runaways

Posted in World fiction at 1:19 pm by Mark MacLean

Year Of The Runaways26 April 2016, Judith’s

Our real 200th book!

Book 200: The Man Who Loved Children

Posted in Australian author at 1:16 pm by Mark MacLean

Man Who Loved Children29 March 2016, Marion’s

No, not a misprint, our 200th book has been brought forward to allow for those making tracks for Lightning Ridge.

16/02/2016

Book 198: The Temporary Gentleman

Posted in World fiction tagged , at 12:49 pm by Mark MacLean

temporary gentleman23 February 2016, Mark’s place

Sebastian Barry got consistently high praise for his writing from the group, particularly his descriptive passages that captured particular places, events or moods in such a way as to make them entirely real – though they were in fact the addled part-memories of a functioning alcoholic.

Jack McNulty came across as the genial barfly who, through his ability to adapt to almost any situation (as long as he had a pint of whisky inside him). The only situation who couldn’t adapt to was one that involved emotion or empathy or the ability to understand the needs of another person. In the case of his wife and chldren, this was to have catastrophic and lifelong effects on them all.

Barry’s powers of description, which made his writing so powerful, were also (for some) his downfall. Critics felt that, sometimes, the descriptive pieces went just that bit too far, causing some to glaze over a little and speed-certain passages.

Luckily we had some fans of Barry’s work to provide a little background. Knowing that Barry shared a bed with his grandfather, himself a “temporary gentleman” and great storyteller, helped make sense of a lot of the book’s content and narrative style.

And here’s the man himself, reading that extraordinary opening passage. (Wish I’d watched this earlier: it made me rethink Jack as a much more robust character!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QslROK2gM0Q

Simon 8, Helen 8, Marion 7, Judith 7, Wendy 8, Karen 8, Jo 7, Suzanne 8, Charles 8, Jane 7, Mark 6. Average = 7.45.

01/11/2015

Book 197: Go Set A Watchman

Posted in World fiction at 3:36 pm by Mark MacLean

26 January 2016, Suzanne’sgo set a watchman

The second part of our double-header, Harper Lee’s “new” book.

Oh dear. I read this “first” book second, and was bitterly disappointed. No other way to put it. The most startling revelation of the night was that the two manuscripts were produced about three years apart. Can that even be possible? Did Lee go to the crossroads and sell her soul to the devil or something?

This was a dull affair: flat characters, turgid dialogue, poor plotting and pace. Obviously not the one that Truman Capote wrote.

Marion 4, Judith 4, Jo 6, Helen 5, Wendy 5, Karen 5, Charles 5, Suzanne 6, Simon 4, Mark 6. Average = 5.

NOTE

What’s going on with me? I didn’t like it and yet I give it 6? And, scrolling down the blog, I see that I gave We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves and 8, and yet this month I couldn’t even remember what it was about?

Book 196: To Kill A Mockingbird

Posted in Classic at 3:32 pm by Mark MacLean

To Kill A Mockingbird26 January 2016, Suzanne’s, I think

The first part of our traditional double-header of the Christmas / New Year period: Harper Lee versus Harper Lee.

Which one to read first? We all approached this aspect of the big read differently, and part of the discussion did circulate around how much “order of read” affected the reader’s enjoyment (or not) of the companion volume.

Remarkably, there were a few people present who had made it into late adulthood without ever having read TKAM. Personally, I’ve always been a miserly marker and of the opinion that no book deserves 10 as that leaves you with nowhere to go, but after re-reading Mockingbird I’ve ditched that philosophy. To me, it’s as good as a work of fiction can get.

Marion 8, Judith 8, Jo 8, Helen 8, Wendy 8, Karen 9, Charles 10, Suzanne 9, Simon 8, Mark 10. Average = 8.6

31/10/2015

Book 195: Cold Comfort Farm

Posted in Classic at 3:44 pm by Mark MacLean

December 2015, Jane’s [No! I think we ended up at Suzanne’s because Jane was in Sydney. Anybody?]Cold Comfort Farm

We did have a book that we’d all chosen and agreed upon. But then we all forgot what it was called, and who the author was, and we realised that none of us had actually written it down. How can this happen? Are we really all that dotty? Apparently so.

In its stead we went back to a classic, in this case Stella Gibbons’s Cold Comfort Farm, which claimed the #57 spot in the Guardian’s best novels.

This was one that divided us, not quite evenly. I do think that Charlie needs to write up the report for this one, as the only member who – as a youth – could quote passages at length, a la Python.

Sadly, it didn’t do it for me, but it averaged out moderately well.

Charles 7, Judith 8, Karen 7, Jo 7, Simon 3, Helen 5, Suzanne 7, Marion 5, Mark 5, Wendy away. Average = 6.

 

26/08/2015

Book 194: We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves

Posted in World fiction at 6:08 pm by Mark MacLean

we_are_all_completely27 October 2015, Judith’s

What a difference a month makes. We met at Judith’s as poor Jo was indisposed. Thankfully we had a good book to discuss and lift our spirits.

Our marks:
Judith 7; Helen 8; Wendy 6; Simon 8; Charles 6; Karen 7; Mark 8; Suzanne (postal vote) 8. Average = 7.25

Book 193: The Illuminations

Posted in World fiction tagged , at 6:00 pm by Mark MacLean

29 September 2015, Helen and Simon’sThe Illuminations

A packed house at Helen and Simon’s! When did we last have everyone there? (I could look this up on my phone, but I haven’t got a spare three hours.)

Andrew O’Hagan’s The Illuminations was well received by everyone, the only difference of opinion was whether it was better than Be Near Me or not (majority consensus: it was).

The twin stories of Anne, falling into the abyss of Alzheimer’s in a Scottish coastal sheltered home for the aged, and that of her grandson Luke, a soldier serving in Afghanistan, offers an unlikely coupling at first. But O’Hagan works hard at creating believable worlds; indeed, the world of the soldiers (and their endless nagging, abbreviated banter) was an aspect of the book that everyone felt was strongly executed. Similarly, the push-pull of Anne’s neighbour Maureen, with her needy but barbed relationship with her family was immediately recognisable.

One of our books of the year.

Our marks
Wendy 7; Charles 7; Karen 8; Helen 8; Judith 7; Simon 8; Jane 7; Jo 7; Suzanne 8; Marion 7; Mark 7. Average = 7.37

192: Amnesia

Posted in Australian author tagged , at 5:56 pm by Mark MacLean

25 August 2015, Suzanne’sAmnesia

There was a general consensus that we like Peter Carey, most of the time, usually. Pretty well everyone liked the start of Amnesia, but it was how we responded to the second half that divided us. Suzanne spoke up for the “like” camp, those who were prepared to be carried along by its Dickensian sweep, vine-like plot tendrils and wonderfully imagined characters. There were however more people who felt let down by the second half; Marion even hung in there before throwing up her hands with barely 10 pages to go.

The lack of resolution was a common criticism, as was the cavalcade of incidental characters who provided nothing in terms of plot direction. And even the main characters left readers bewildered by the actions. Judith (by correspondence, recovering from a lurgy picked up OS) was the book’s harshest critic; she did not empathise with or believe in any of the characters. As she said (via email):

What a great idea for a novel. What a mess of a book.

Part One was certainly interesting, although, contrary to the blurb, it’s more about the past than the present. It certainly raised my expectations. Part 2 was the big disappointment. The book is said to be about hacking, but hacking as a plot element really doesn’t exist. Gaby is said to be a brilliant hacker but only is so in theory, and not in a way that affects the plot (what there is of it).

Carey is always interesting when he hangs plots on an historical episode or moment, but in this book he drops fascinating teasers about historical moments and then abandons them. When the book gets to the present there are random references to environmental concerns that seem to go nowhere. As does the plot.

As for the characters, none of them I found engaging. Not because they are unlikeable (I found Michael Beard in Solar engaging, and he certainly wasn’t likeable), but because they are really not very interesting. They all seem to be narcissistic, and in most cases interchangeable. And Felix is just a bore – I cannot believe that he produces a masterpiece straight off without any editing or rewriting. Perhaps the book improves in the 30 pages I left out at the end when I got too fed up with it.

Phew!

I was in the enviable position of only having read the first third of the book and so I was still at the “rollicking yarn” stage. However, I couldn’t mark the book. So:

Judith 2; Jo 6; Wendy 6; Karen 5; Charles 4; Suzanne 7; Marion 6. Average 5.2

Next page

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.